On recent TWiP podcasts, Alex Lindsay suggested a couple of cool product ideas:
- using a computer and one or more projectors to “paint” light onto a studio scene e.g. you could dial-in that you want a certain part of a scene (e.g. a model) lit with warmer light and the software would change the image that’s being projected with the desired light colors and shape. Of course, you’d need a lot of light out of the projectors to light any substantial set up. This idea, however, seems eminently doable. Throw in advances in LED lighting over the next couple of years, and there’s some good potential for a portable lighting configuration.
- a camera manufacturer that solely focuses on manufacturing the lenses and sensor and ships a simple body that puts the two together. In addition, it provides a slot to drop in your iPhone and makes available a simple, but comprehensive API, to control the hardware. Then, developers can develop UI’s to meet different classes of use cases e.g. HDR, time lapse, basic, etc. As they discussed on the show, the manufacturers have demonstrated a complete inability to design a good user interface in the menus or in the hardware.
As I mentioned in my earlier post, I did find the physical controls of the Minolta Maxxum 7D very compelling; the potential manufacturer would have to put in some creative thought on providing programmable physical interfaces on the barebones camera as well.
Billo pointed out that a focusing screen would not be much help with manual focus while shooting a movie with my new Canon DSLR, since the mirror is flipped up / open while you’re shooting a movie.
Guess I’ll have to opt for an LCD viewfinder loupe instead.
I’ve always loved driving fast cars (perhaps it has something to do with the time I spent in Michigan). I recently got the opportunity to drive the Nissan GT-R. It’s a very fast car: 0-60 in around 3.4 seconds powered by a twin turbo V6. I was half expecting (and hoping) that Nissan had done something magical and gotten rid of the usual turbo lag, but alas, that was not the case. Still something to be said for that big engine kick, supercharged or not.
Of course, once you got going, you got going! Rolling launches were also much more responsive.
A very nice touch: the center panel gives you detailed metrics from any of the car’s many sensors. You can have it display g-forces, clutch positions, temperatures, etc. Of course, while you’re busy accelerating to very high speeds on non-track surfaces, you have little mental bandwidth left to look anywhere but at the road.
After my drive, another friend told me that Nissan got the Grand Theft Auto designers to design the panel – I have not verified if that was actually the case.
All in all, neat car – would love to play with that paddle shifter next time around.
I finally bit the bullet and moved from being a Minolta guy to a Canon guy. I wanted to start investing more in photography gear and wanted to do it with a system that’s more common and has more options available. I tried out both Canon and Nikon cameras, and ultimately decided to go with the Canon T2i. I looked at the 7D (and longingly at the 5D Mark II), but ultimately decided to save money on the body and invest in a nice lens instead.
Took a while to get used to all the different controls on the Canon – it’s still an on-going process. I have to say, even though my Minolta DSLR is old now (~4 years, which is ancient these days), it still has far more ergonomic manual controls. Everything on the Minolta Maxxum 7D is adjustable with a physical control and the controls are laid out well. With the Canon, I have to fuss around with electronic display menus much more. But I am loving the Canon – my pictures are much sharper than before, thanks to the image stabilization in the lens, as well as higher quality optics.
I do also like the ability to record beautiful 1080p, 24fps video from the camera. I have so much respect for the focus pullers who work on TV shows and movies. I’m thinking of investing in a split-prism focusing grid for the Canon so that manual focusing in video mode will be much easier.
Before that though, the next stop is going to be: 50mm, f/1.4 lens.
Atul Gawande, in one his recent books (maybe Better) mentioned that one should count something all the time. I recently took a taxi to the train station and the cab driver mentioned that previously, of the people heading into the T with bags, 6 or 7 out of 10 would instead come to the taxi station right next to the T stop and take a taxi instead.
As a sign of the downturn, he mentioned that he now sees only three folks out of ten take a taxi. The rest decide to just lug their big bags down the stairs and all around the T-stops.
Daniel was right when he suggested that a daily post was quite ambitious. It indeed has been. I have been generating ideas for blog posts and writing them down in various places, but am only now starting to turn them into posts.
As you may have noticed, I’ve been spending a lot of time with digital photography these days. On my commute to and from work, I have ample time to listen to podcasts (esp. at the 2x speed that my iPod allows). I’ve been listening to podcasts hosted by various folks, and I’ve been struck by my own preference for particular hosts.
My preference has nothing to do with the content of the show – all of the podcasts I listen to (e.g. tfttf.com, techguylabs.com, martinbailyphotography.com, dpexperience.com, and twiplog.com) – have fairly good content, but some of the hosts (Chris Marquardt and Frederick Van Johnson) are a significant cut above the rest when it comes to their style.
Similarly, I’ve noticed with the MarketWatch show on NPR at 6:30 ET (in the Boston area) that Kai Ryssdal usually hosts. I find the show far more entertaining and engaging when Kai hosts it than when other folks host (while he’s out for short periods). I’ve tried to listen more closely to figure out exactly what’s the difference – cadence in speaking, intonation and variance of both tone and speed of speaking, the actual content itself – and haven’t quite been able to identify the “basis vectors” yet.
Great post today on CrunchGear about how resolution has nothing to do with image quality. Has an excellent in-depth walk-through of how light enters a lens and ultimately gets written out to memory and everything that can turn the image to garbage in-between. I vaguely knew this process; the post really goes into great depth while keeping the explanation relative easy to consume.
The motivation for the CrunchGear post was the announcement of a 1/6″ sensor from Omnivision that records 1080p.
I met someone who is in the satellite business and works with SES Astra. I asked a bunch of questions since it’s not often you get a chance to learn about the business of satellites.
I wondered if bandwidth on satellites would be a shrinking business as more and more of the world gets wired with undersea fibre. Short answer: no. Many times, satellite bandwidth is cheaper e.g. for providing broadband to remote areas in the US and Europe. It’s cheaper for major telcos to acquire bandwidth over satellite than lay down cable.
I remember a similar reason for the use of solar power out in the Serengeti – it’s too expensive and intrusive to lay cables for power in remote areas. Solar power is presumably quite competitive in such environments, especially since sun is plentiful.
Satellite bandwidth for broadband continues to decline in price, with roughly a 75% decline in unit prices over the last five or so years [the numbers were in conversation, so take all these as rough approximations].
Until now, projects in Africa have been a common use case for satellite providers. Paul English recently launched JoinAfrica.org to cover Africa in free, low-bandwidth Internet access, which may change things or it may use satellite-provided broadband for major access points.
I recently learned about the “Nodal Point” in the photography context. If you rotate a lens around this point while taking multi-image panoramic pictures, you will not get any parallax error. It turns out that there’s actually a tripod specifically designed for this use: the Nodal Ninja.
I did a quick search on Wikipedia to learn more about the Nodal Point before writing this post and learned that in fact the term Nodal Point is a misnomer. The point around which you have to rotate the camera to get a panorama is actually the center of the lens’ entrance pupil. Fortunately, the Nodal Ninja folks point this out on their home page – the other name for this point is the No Parallax Point; however, it seems that folks in photography have started and stuck to calling it the nodal point, and so the misnomer continues.
The Nodal Ninja is a cool device worth considering if you’re going to be taking lots of panoramas (e.g. if you’re going to the Southwest). Another similar device, though more expensive, is the GigaPan EPIC Pro.